Severity reflects the AI reading's own wording — it is not a diagnosis, and not your radiologist's opinion.
New or worsening symptoms? Contact your doctor promptly, whatever this summary says.
On the slices showing the metatarsal bases and the cuneiform/cuboid row, the fat planes between the bone bases appear slightly heterogeneous with intermediate signal filling some intervals, in contrast to the brighter uniform fat elsewhere in the foot; the bony bases remain closely apposed to one another on these images.
At the metatarsal shaft level a small well-defined rounded focus of very bright signal lies within the plantar soft tissue near the medial margin, distinct from the surrounding intermediate-signal muscle and the dark flexor tendons.
On the long-axis slices the bases of the metatarsals meet the cuneiforms and cuboid along a continuous row; the interval between adjacent metatarsal bases and the dorsal step between the first/second metatarsal base and the medial/intermediate cuneiform is the most significant area to evaluate for this series, as any widening or dorsal offset there is what bears on the stated concern. On these slices the cortical margins of the metatarsal bases and cuneiforms remain apposed without a clearly displaced fragment.
On the true cross-sectional slices the rounded low-signal tendon bundles arranged around the plantar and medial aspect of the tarsal bones are intact and uniformly dark, each separated from its neighbour by thin bright fat.
On these axial slices, no abnormality was seen in the imaged tarsal bones (talus, calcaneus, navicular, cuboid and cuneiforms), the metatarsal bases, shafts and heads, or the intrinsic foot musculature and visible flexor/extensor tendons; the imaged cortical outlines appear continuous and the marrow signal is uniformly bright without a displaced fragment or step across the tarsometatarsal row.
AI-assisted scan reading — not a clinical report
Issued: 2026-10-08
This document was generated by artificial intelligence from the scan images. It is an explanatory aid, NOT a diagnosis and NOT a substitute for a radiologist report. Always discuss it with your doctor.
Whole-exam read: 37 of 37 series, 37 representative slices in total.
This was an MRI (a scan that uses a magnetic field and radio waves to make detailed pictures of soft tissue and bone) of your foot, taken because of a concern about a possible dislocation or a Lisfranc injury in the midfoot. The reading focused on the midfoot, where the bases of the long foot bones meet the smaller midfoot bones — the area most relevant to that concern. Importantly, the different readings of these same images did not agree about the key midfoot area, so a human radiologist needs to review the pictures to settle those points.
Because the readings disagreed about the most important midfoot area, the main message here is that these images do not give a clear, agreed answer on their own — a radiologist (a doctor who specializes in reading scans) needs to review them to decide what is actually there. Where a reading describes the bone edges sitting together, that is one reading's view and not a final verdict, since others disagreed. A Lisfranc injury involves the ligaments and alignment at the midfoot, and uneven fat between the bones or a change in spacing can sometimes be relevant to that kind of question, but this cannot be confirmed from the conflicting readings alone. The small bright spot and the tendon description were each raised by only one reading, so they should be confirmed rather than assumed. None of this is a diagnosis — it is a summary of what the readings did and did not agree on.
Produced by
Read Your Scan
Automatically generated document — no physician signature.